On 12/09/2013 18:30, Mark Mason wrote:
> I think the ticket is the N3K-C3064TQ-10GT [Nexus 3064-T, 48 10GBase-T and 4 
> QSFP+ ports]. Looks like it's still new and isn't quite available to be 
> configured in the system and the price is pretty delicious.

$53,400 GPL, according to teh interwebs.  Nice money for porting NXOS to a
trident based box.

Nick

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Aled Morris
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:02 PM
> To: Mark Mason
> Cc: Oliver Garraux; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss
> 
> Well, when I said I thought the switches were equal, I wasn't referring to 
> the price!
> 
> Cisco, always "reassuringly expensive" :-)
> 
> Aled
> 
> On 12 September 2013 17:57, Mark Mason 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Yea, the Nexus 6k lineup is quite a bit more expensive than the 3k lineup. 
> The pricing and builds for the 3k's aren't too bad. Great input guys!
> 
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of Aled Morris
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:49 AM
> To: Mark Mason
> Cc: Oliver Garraux; 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss
> 
> I don't have hands-on experience with them but I assumed that Cisco 6001T = 
> Arista 7050T and Cisco 6001P = Arista 7050S
> 
> Aled
> 
> On 12 September 2013 17:46, Mark Mason 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Yea, actually just seeing that now! Might have a winner!
> 
> 
> From: Oliver Garraux 
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:46 AM
> To: Aled Morris
> Cc: Mark Mason; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss
> 
> How is the Arista 7050 different than the Nexus 3064?  Cisco recently slashed 
> the pricing on several of the 3064 models by quite a bit.  I'm not intimately 
> familiar with Arista pricing, but the 3064's current list price isn't widely 
> different than what I see for the Arista 7050 on a few sites.
> 
> Oliver
> 
> -------------------------------------
> 
> Oliver Garraux
> Check out my blog:  blog.garraux.net<http://blog.garraux.net>
> Follow me on Twitter:  
> twitter.com/olivergarraux<http://twitter.com/olivergarraux>
> 
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Aled Morris 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> If you are brand-loyal to Cisco you might want to look at the Nexus 3000 or
> Nexus 6000 ranges.
> 
> Aled
> 
> 
> 
> On 12 September 2013 15:56, Mark Mason 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> The Cisco product line seems to be missing an equivalent of the Arista
>> 7050 100Mb/1Gb/10GBase-T. Maybe taking the 4500x platform converting the 32
>> SFP ports to copper, and then expansion slot 4x40Gb ports then drop the
>> price 10k+ we might have a match. Thoughts NSP community?
>> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
>> intended
>> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The
>> message,
>> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
>> information.
>> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or
>> distribution
>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
>> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
> message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
> distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
> message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
> distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
> 
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
> message, 
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
> distribution 
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to