On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 08:54:44 PM Lukasz Bromirski wrote: > Indeed. But NCS 6k won’t be typical router for everyone - > depending on scale, feature requirements and of course > interface choice and price. CRS-3 and CRS-X are here > also :)
Agree. The majority of ISP's will still find the CRS and CRS-X more than sufficient, especially if they're still going to dabble with non-Ethernet ports (SONET/SDH, mostly), and Gig-E. Juniper's MX480/960 will be other options still at play, in a world where we're now seeing the NCS and PTX. The NCS and PTX have their place in the eco system, but it won't be for everyone. Not in the medium term anyway. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
