On 11/10/13 14:11, Matthew Huff wrote:
FYI,
At least cisco went back end and added caveats to the documentation
about this limitation. Since I had combed through all the
documentation beforehand, had the caveat been there, it would have
been likely we would have purchased a different set of hardware.
Have they pulled that great Cisco trick of updating the docs but not
updating the "last edited" timestamp, fooling you into thinking it's
always been there?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
