Thanks for the information about the shared pool of TCAM which explains
everything.
Sup2T-XL --> show platform hardware cef maximum-routes
Fib-size: 1024k (1048576),shared-size: 1016k (1040384),
shared-usage: 482k(493974)
Protocol Max-routes Use-shared-region Dedicated
-------- ---------- ----------------- ---------
IPV4 1017k Yes 1k
IPV4-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
IPV6 1017k Yes 1k
IPV6-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
MPLS 1017k Yes 1k
EoMPLS 1017k Yes 1k
VPLS-IPV4-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
VPLS-IPV6-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
On 05/11/2013 17:25, Chris Welti wrote:
As Rinse Kloek already mentioned, the Sup2T has only 1M entries, but a shared
pool of TCAM space.
Sup2T#show platform hardware cef maximum-routes
Fib-size: 1024k (1048576), shared-size: 1016k (1040384), shared-usage:
151k(155130)
Protocol Max-routes Use-shared-region Dedicated
-------- ---------- ----------------- ---------
IPV4 1017k Yes 1k
IPV4-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
IPV6 1017k Yes 1k
IPV6-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
MPLS 1017k Yes 1k
EoMPLS 1017k Yes 1k
VPLS-IPV4-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
VPLS-IPV6-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
There is no repartitioning needed on the Sup2T.
Cheers,
Chris
Am 05/11/13 17:18, schrieb Jon Lewis:
Your paste formatting got all screwy, but it looks like the Sup2TXL claims it
can do both 1M v4 routes _and_ half a million v6 routes simultaneously. I've
heard that from others, but also read the specs to be the same as the 3BXL. I
wonder if anyone from cisco can shed some light on this?
On the Sup2T-XL, had you done any mls cef maximum-routes tuning? The page
below both states that the PFC4XL has no more FIB capacity than the PFC3XL, and
that the default split on the PFC4XL is 512k IPv4 routes. This doesn't appear
consistent with what you're seeing.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-676346.html
The FIB in the PFC4 contains 256 K entries, while the FIB in the PFC4XL
contains 1 million entries. These are the same as their PFC3x forwarding engine
counterparts. The FIB in the PFC4 contains prefix entries for IPv4 and IPv6
global address, IPv4 and IPv6 multicast addresses and MPLS label entries. There
is a level of partitioning that exists to ensure there is always some space
available for different types of forwarding entries. There is some flexibility
from a user configuration standpoint that allows these partition boundaries to
be changed to accommodate more of one type of forwarding entry. For example, in
the PFC4XL, the default setting provides for 512 K IPv4 entries, and this can
be increased through configuration control to support up to 1 M entries if
required.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Christian Schmit wrote:
Today I tested a Sup2T-XL and a Sup720BXL in the lab with full bgp feeds for
ipv4 and ipv6.
To my understanding the hardware capacity for the FIB TCAM is the same for
Sup720-BXL and Sup2T-XL.
Sup2T-XL output of "sh platform hardware capacity":CAT6500-RC2TXL#sh platform
hardware capacity | begin L3 Forwarding Resources
L3 Forwarding Resources FIB TCAM usage:
Total Used %Used 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM)
1048576 465980 44% 144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6)
524288 14903 3% 288 bits (IPv6 mcast)
262144 1 1%
detail: Protocol Used %Used
IPv4 465978
44% MPLS 1
1% EoM 1
1%
IPv6 14894
3% IPv4 mcast 9
1% IPv6 mcast 1
1%
Adjacency usage: Total Used %Used
1048576 32018
3%
Sup720BXL output of "sh platform hardware capacity": (FIB TCAM partitioned with "mls
cef maximum-routes ip 768")
CAT6500-RC720BXL#sh platform hardware capacity | begin L3 Forwarding Resources
L3 Forwarding Resources
FIB TCAM usage: Total Used
%Used
72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 802816 467348 58%
144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6) 122880 14970
12%
detail: Protocol Used %Used
IPv4 467338
58%
MPLS 9 1%
EoM 1
1%
IPv6 14963
12%
IPv4 mcast 4 1%
IPv6 mcast 3 1%
Adjacency usage: Total Used %Used
1048576 1481
1%
The release notes say:
-XL mode:
· IPv4 and MPLS: Up to 1,007,000 routes
· IPv4 multicast and IPv6 unicast and multicast: Up to 503,000 routes
"These are the theoretical maximum numbers of routes for the supported protocols
(the maximums are not supported simultaneously):"
The above output of the Sup2T-XL seems to say that the Sup2T-XL has a larger
FIB TCAM (2M) than the Sup720-BXL.
Christian
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
