>On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 04:43:22 PM Oliver Boehmer
>(oboehmer) wrote:
>
>> No, and neither does ISIS, and I am not aware of any such
>> a requirement. Seriously?
>
>Yeah, millions of IGP entries is not a typical requirement,
>AFAIK. BGP issues don't necessarily propagate to the IGP
>:-).
>
>I think any IGP would fall over before it gets to 1,000,000
>entries, simply because of the nature of the link-state
>protocol design.
no doubt here.. hence I really wonder who would ever put forward such a
requirement (and Adam added a smiley, so not sure ;-)..
We have unified-mpls to scale to very large MPLS domains, but the IGP
certainly doesn't need to scale anywhere close to this..
oli
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
