Just got confirmed with a SR . Bug on SR. VRRP v6 on XR does not work with other platforms.
Thanks. Regards, Danny On Thursday, 7 November 2013 6:38 PM, Xu Hu <[email protected]> wrote: one recommendation is that check the ttl value for xr and junos. >I got one case regarding iOS & IOS-XR, then cannot talk, finnaly i sniffer the >detail packet and found that the default ttl value is different, so both >cannot recognise each other. > > >On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, Danny Pinto <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Thanks I able to get VRRP working on v6 between two XR 12K boxes. >> >> But when I try to get VRRP working between a XR12K and JunOS on MX . v4 >> VRRP works fine. >> >> VRRP v6 does not come up , getting some checksum errors on the debug for v6 >> and both the boxes are becoming masters ! Any clue ? >> >> Anything needs to be done to get VRRP v6 working between XR and JunOS. ? >> below is configuration & logs . >> >> >> XR 12000 >> >> >> >> interface Gi0/2/1/6.451 >> description VRRP Test 2 >> ipv4 address 172.0.51.2 255.255.255.248 >> ipv6 address 2001:1234:0:e::451:2/112 >> dot1q vlan 451 >> >> >> router vrrp >> interface Gi0/2/1/6.451 >> address-family ipv4 >> vrrp 10 version 3 >> priority 110 >> address 172.0.51.3 >> ! >> ! >> address-family ipv6 >> vrrp 10 >> priority 110 >> address linklocal fe80::cafe:1 >> address global 2001:1234:0:e::451:3 >> ! >> >> >> Juniper MX >> >> @sar4.BLB# show interfaces ge-0/1/9.451 >> description "VRRP Test 2 cr2.BLB"; >> vlan-id 451; >> family inet { >> address 172.0.51.1/29 { >> vrrp-group 10 { >> virtual-address 172.0.51.3; >> priority 200; >> } >> } >> } >> family inet6 { >> address 2001:1234:0:e::451:1/112 { >> vrrp-inet6-group 10 { >> virtual-inet6-address 2001:1234:0:e::451:3; >> virtual-link-local-address fe80::cafe:1; >> priority 200; >> } >> } >> } >> >> show protocols vrrp | display set >> set protocols vrrp traceoptions file VRRP >> set protocols vrrp traceoptions flag all >> deactivate protocols vrrp traceoptions >> set protocols vrrp version-3 >> >> >> >> Error logs >> >> I see follow logs on XR debugs. V4 is working okay.checksum errors for IPv6 >> >> RP/0/9/CPU0:Nov 6 09:34:08.166 : vrrp[1108]: Gi0/2/1/6.451: Prot err: src >> fe80::8271:1f01:c3f1:2832: Received packet has invalid checksum: 31410 >> RP/0/9/CPU0:Nov 6 09:34:08.238 : vrrp[1108]: Gi0/2/1/6.451: VR10: Pkt: >> ADVER: In: pri 200 src 172.0.51.1 >> RP/0/9/CPU0:Nov 6 09:34:08.238 : vrrp[1108]: Gi0/2/1/6.451: VR10: IPv4: >> Prot evt: Out: Master_Down timer restarted for 3 sec, 570 msec >> g aRP/0/9/CPU0:Nov 6 09:34:09.030 : vrrp[1108]: Gi0/2/1/6.451: Prot err: >> src fe80::8271:1f01:c3f1:2832: Received packet has invalid checksum: 31410 >> >> >> RP/0/9/CPU0:cr2.BLB#show vrrp interface Gi0/2/1/6.451 >> Wed Nov 6 09:35:27.334 IST >> IPv4 Virtual Routers: >> A indicates IP address owner >> | P indicates configured to preempt >> | | >> Interface vrID Prio A P State Master addr VRouter addr >> Gi0/2/1/6.451 10 110 P Backup 172.0.51.1 172.0.51.3 >> IPv6 Virtual Routers: >> A indicates IP address owner >> | P indicates configured to preempt >> | | >> Interface vrID Prio A P State Master addr VRouter addr >> Gi0/2/1/6.451 10 110 P Master local fe80::cafe:1 >> >> >> MX JunOS >> >> ge-0/1/9.451 up 10 master Active A 0.573 lcl >> 172.0.51.1 >> vip >> 172.0.51.3 >> ge-0/1/9.451 up 10 master Active A 0.005 lcl >> 2001:1234:0:e::451:1 >> vip >> fe80::cafe:1 >> vip >> 2001:1234:0:e::451:3 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 12:20 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>I am looking for VRRP support on XR - 12000 / GSR with global IPv6 >>>>virtual address to achieve something like below . But seems XR is not >>>>supporting it on 12K . Can anyone confirm what is supported on XR for >>>>12000s ? >>>> >>>>[...] >>> >>>>RP/0/9/CPU0:PE-test7.bl(config-vrrp-virtual-router)#show configuration >>>>failed >>>>Tue Nov 5 02:29:22.517 IST >>>>!! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by >>>>!! the system due to semantic errors. The individual >>>>!! errors with each failed configuration command can be >>>>!! found below. >>>> >>>> >>>>router vrrp >>>> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/3.404 >>>> address-family ipv6 >>>> vrrp 4 >>>> address global 2001:954:0:f::1:1 >>>>!!% 'vrrp' detected the 'warning' condition 'No Primary VRRP IP address >>>>exists for this VRID' >>>> ! >>>> ! >>> >>>vrrp on xr requires a linklocal address to be configured, best use >>>autoconfig: >>> >>>router vrrp >>>interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/3.404 >>> address-family ipv6 >>> vrrp 4 >>> address linklocal autoconfig >>> >>> address global 2001:954:0:f::1:1 >>> >>> >>>Hope this works >>> >>> >>> oli >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
