Adam, Is this ME3600X-24CX? Best Regards,
[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 <http://www.cisco.com/> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: adam vitkovsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, December 20, 2013 2:07 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Not working tLDP or PW between me3600 15.3(3)S1a Hi folks, Just to follow up on this with our latest findings. The new HW revision boxes (port numbers marked with up and down arrows) are sending targeted LDP hellos with IP TTL of 0, the outer label has TTL 255. So the PHP nodes will drop the hellos instead of forwarding them to VC head end/tail end. This behavior seems to be triggered by something, we have yet to identify what that trigger is. Reproducible after reloads and also on 15.3(3)S1. So another below the belt punch (we had older HW revision boxes in the lab unfortunately). adam -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Vitkovsky Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:28 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [c-nsp] Not working tLDP or PW between me3600 15.3(3)S1a Hi folks, Anyone running targeted LDP session or p2p PW forthat matter between two not directly connected me3600s please? I have a weird issue on 15.3(3)S1a - four boxes in a square topology. The directly connected switches form the tLDP adjacencies and PWs just fine, however the non-directly connected boxes do not. They don't even try to, according to "debug mpls ldp messages sent/recceived" The tLDP sessions are formed on loopbacks and loopbacks are reachable both via ip and mpls. adam _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
