On Thursday, January 02, 2014 04:47:22 PM Phil Mayers wrote: > I knew there was something else I meant to ask: since I > know you've had an interest in it, do you have any idea > how MVPNv6 will pan out absent LDP/RSVP to signal the > LSPs? Can SR do this job?
At this time (on Junos anyway, which I have more experience with re: NG-MVPN), you can transport IPv6 Multicast traffic in an NG-MVPN. I should expect Cisco and ALU have an implementation as well. It is based on 6VPE, really, since the "VPN" portion of NG- MVPN is really just a Unicast l3vpn instantiation. Of course, it is my hope that native MPLSv6 will also add support for p2mpv6 and mp2mpv6 scenarios over SR, which will enable true/native NG-MVPNv6 (dual-stack, of course, shared within a single NG-MVPN VRF, of course). Given that LDPv6 and RSVPv6 have poor vendor interest at the moment, you can be reasonably confident mLDPv6 or p2mp RSVP- TEv6 will never see the light of day either. So yes, SR is probably where we want to be pushing for this from vendors as well. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
