On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:52:47 PM [email protected] wrote: > I heard something that it might get L3 and MPLS in the > future. Can't be sure though. If it got that it would > make a very nice access device. I'm not sure why the > documentation sucks so badly for it though. Maybe it is > another BU that has it? Otherwise Waris and others have > done a great job on documenting 3600/3800.
Same BU, and documentation will get better as the product becomes more mainstream. This once, actually, I'd rather they focus on keeping this box as an FTTH AN. Perhaps if operators are horny for similar features to the ME3600X in this platform, Cisco can develop a version for the same (they can do that as a software license so the hardware remains the same). But given this is merchant silicon, don't expect the same level of MPLS performance and/or feature set as you get in the ME3600X/3800X. It can be quite annoying if you are looking for feature parity between the two, in the same working scenario, and you don't get it. But that's just me :-)... Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
