Hi list,
I am trying to manipulate the next-hop for community-tagged routes, inbound
on a 6PE router. Routes are received from route-reflectors, and should be
treated inbound. In this specific scenario I am trying to change a
next-hop. The configuration is based on what we have in production on IOS
today, where this works just fine.
PE is ASR9000 running IOS-XR 4.3.2.
My configuration;
Non-essential configuration has been omitted.
router static
address-family ipv6 unicast
2001:db8::160/128 Null0
::ffff:192.168.0.1/128 Null0
router bgp <asn>
neighbor-group IPv6RR
address-family ipv6 labeled-unicast
route-policy rr-edge-in in
route-policy rr-edge-in
if community matches-any (1000:6) and destination in (::/0 ge 64) then
set next-hop 2001:db8::160
endif
pass
end-policy
Also tried this..
route-policy rr-edge-in
if community matches-any (1000:6) and destination in (::/0 ge 64) then
set next-hop ::ffff:192.168.0.1
endif
pass
end-policy
The defined policy is processing the routes. I tried swapping the
"next-hop" statement for a simple "drop", and the prefix was dropped. In
IOS, I use an IPv6 next-hop which works just fine. In IOS-XR, I tried with
both a normal IPv6 unicast address, and with IPv4-mapped address - without
success.
I am sure there is a reasonable explanation for this, and I have a feeling
it lies in the 6PE part of the next-hop magic. As it seems to be working
just fine in IOS, I'm fairly confident it should be possible to do in XR as
well.
Any help is appreciated!
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
