We are using separate areas, same process, albeit not on Cisco gear but that's probably how I would do it on Cisco as well. Generally we put all the access segments off a single location into a small number of areas and aggregate/restrict advertisements into area 0.
Phil On 2/6/14, 9:36 AM, "Adam Vitkovsky" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Folks, > >This is regarding Unified MPLS for LTE aka Hierarchical MPLS with >RFC3107. >I'd like to know whether there are networks out there running separate IGP >processes per each access or aggregation network. >Or whether you are running common IGP and using separate area/level for >each >aggregation/access network please? > >I'm interested for any pros/cons either of these solutions have. >I guess it's no biggie whether there are going to be separate processes in >access and core not talking to each other or just separate areas. >Thank you very much. > >adam > > > > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
