I have been thinking about doing he same thing on our customer access networks. I would be curious what others features you are enabling as well good topic!
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 9, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Mike <mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am looking at tightening up my subscriber access network and, if I > understand the documentation correctly, 'switchport block unicast' will > prevent a cisco switch (3560g in this case) from flooding unicast frames out > any port so configured, unless the destination mac address was learned from > that port. Is there any reason on earth why I would NOT want to have this as > a standard default option? Arp would still work, as would dhcp and pppoe... > trying to fathom how this could be bad? Would appreciate any insights! > > Thank you. > > Mike- > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
