Hello, On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 06:02:50 +0000 "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >On Monday, February 17, 2014 03:24:04 PM Cydon Satyr wrote: > > > >> Should a policy-map with priority/bandwidth/queue > >> parameters be applied on a bundle interface or > >> individual physical interfaces? > > > >With IOS XR, QoS policies are applied on the bundle > >interface, not the member links. > > true, however they are enforced on the physical member links (check out, > for example, http://tools.cisco.com/squish/e8189). This gets tricky when > you want to police/shape some traffic across multiple members to a fixed > amount as there is no shared policy instance across physical ports. I also saw in my practice how the traffic that you want to police, police on each member in Bundle ethernet. It was brute-force traffic on RDP. The 5Mbit police was on BE interface. BE Interface consisted on 4 GE physical links. Client received bandwidth 5x4=20 Mbit. -- Alexandr Gurbo _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
