On Mar 8, 2014, at 3:26 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi, > > >> In the world of IOS-XE, is there an equivalent to the old "S" train >> for service provider use? > > In IOS-XE there is no distinction such as S/M/T or GD. > > What you do have in IOS-XE is Extended-Support releases and Standard-Support > releases [1]. For new deployments I would recommend the latest rebuild of > the 3.10S train, which is 3.10.02S (3.7S has already been EOL'ed). You can > also see that they have "ext" or "std" in the filename.
Dang, I was kind of in the neighborhood. At a URL I can no longer dig up, I saw that 3.7S was to be supported for a very, very long time, so I thought I'd found a good candidate there. Right now CCO is giving me an error on pretty much everything, so I can't get a better look at the list, but perhaps I can refine my question anyhow… Since this is a single-RP router (no "issu" available, I believe) and we're not asking for too much from it, I'd like to avoid service interruptions just to follow a short-lived release. > > > > Regards, > > Lukas > > > [1] > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/product_bulletin_c25-726436.html > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
