Hi Lukasz, I have already contacted our local Cisco office, we will see what they have to say.
Thank you for your help. :) On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Łukasz Bromirski <[email protected]>wrote: > Pavel, > > On 25 Apr 2014, at 14:07, Pavel Dimow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > I saw that, but I am confused with CGN terminology and license. > > Cisco says I need separate license for CGN and separate license for > NAT64, yet they can't be used together. > > More over, they say you can have NAT 256000 sessions per box or you can > have 500000 CGN sessions. > > Can I buy CGN license and have 500000 NAT64 sessions or CGN is NAT44 > sessions only? > > Both licenses are RTU and interchangeable. The limits you’re about > to hit come from ESP scalability, not from license enforcement. > > Who’s your Partner? I can make sure somebody from Cisco in your > country will help you in discussing the proper configuration > (I’m from Cisco and based in Poland). > > -- > "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski > you don't know what you're talking | jid:[email protected] > about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
