What version? Sent from my iPhone
> On May 23, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Pasquino Andrea <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have working VCs (port based) with this syntax: > > interface GigabitEthernet0/11 > switchport trunk allowed vlan none > switchport mode trunk > mtu xxxx > service instance 1 ethernet > encapsulation untagged , dot1q 1-4094 > ! > l2vpn xconnect context xxxxx > member GigabitEthernet0/11 service-instance 1 > member x.x.x.x 10001 encapsulation mpls > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > However I'm not able to set MTU for vlan based VCs with the same syntax: > > interface TenGigabitEthernet0/2 > ! > [many other service instances] > ! > service instance 930 ethernet > encapsulation dot1q 930 > rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric > ! > l2vpn xconnect context 10003 > member TenGigabitEthernet0/2 service-instance 930 > member x.x.x.x 10003 encapsulation mpls > > The VC retains the MTU of the physical interface and I'm not happy with that ! > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > With the "old" xconnect syntax under the service instance I could set MTU... > > Best Regards > > Andrea Pasquino > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
