There are a couple of bugs. Not sure of the bug ID but there is one that only happens if you have a shut down peer. It causes a memory leak.
Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. O: 720.891.2502 | [email protected] | www.viawest.com | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Kleefass Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP funny in SXI Hi Gert, On 26.05.2014 10:06 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > There is a bit of BGP churn on this router, but all BGP peers are "up" > (so no "updates to some members of an update-group are stuck") and all > BGP table versions in "show ip b su" are much higher than 681600139 - > OTOH, one or the other peer is always slow enough so that not all of > the peers seem to reach the exact same table version... > > This particular prefix would have never been announced to the "slow" > eBGP peers anyway, as it was learned from upstream - and the iBGP > update group actually *is* in sync. > > The box in question is at SXI8a, so maybe it's a bug in there and I > really should be updating now... Someone with SXI3 has the same issue: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/yqqaaUV2wXXdBdVt3Qo7 referring to CSCsr62529. BTW: On our ASR 9000, RSP-4G boxes the IPv4 Internet never converges... show bgp ipv4 uni convergence Fri May 30 19:44:08.785 CEST Not converged. Received routes may not be entered in RIB. One or more neighbors may need updating. Cheers, Tim _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
