Can get more luck with voodoo dolls some days. Jared Mauch
> On Aug 15, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Łukasz Bromirski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Open a case with TAC. That's what they are for, right? > > -- > ./ > >> On 15 Aug 2014, at 18:05, Sascha E. Pollok <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Frank, Jared, >> >> I understand your point and I even share it. Sometimes there are setups >> that do not make much sense any other way (this box with DNS server >> mainly serves one single device and no other DNS server around that is >> suitable for the job). >> >> And before I go ahead and try to deploy some other device for that >> purpose I simply wanted to see if I can make it work with what there is. >> >> Thanks >> Sascha >> >> Am 15.08.2014 16:46, schrieb Frank Bulk: >>> Right, but that's all non-Cisco. My comments were intended to be >>> constrained to Cisco. >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 9:42 AM >>> To: Frank Bulk >>> Cc: Sascha E. Pollok; [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Strange corrupt DNS Cache in IOS >>> >>> >>>> On Aug 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Frank Bulk <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Don't use a router as a DNS resolver for customers. Just don't. >>> >>> Or if you are, use something that is properly designed for that function. >>> Check out the UBNT EdgeRouter stuff, cheap, vyatta (JunOS-like), and gives >>> you shell access to do other more advanced stuff. Basically, you can't lose >>> at the unit cost, etc. >>> >>> - Jared >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
