Thanks Arie will research this. BTW, any ideas on the first question? :-) that is, realistic numbers of active broadband users on a 1002 with a 24K license?
On 8/19/14, Arie Vayner (avayner) <[email protected]> wrote: > You may actually want to look at summarizing this. The best practice would > be to have a per-LNS pool (either locally managed or from RADIUS) and > advertise the summary from the LNS up to the network. > You may need to redistribute also connected routes for "fixed IP" services > where a user may have a custom IP from the RADIUS. > > Not summarizing means that every connection (and disconnection) is a BGP > update driving your CPU utilization across the BGP domain... > > > Arie > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mike > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 09:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LNS question asr 1002 > > > On 08/17/2014 08:24 PM, Edwardo Garcia wrote: >> Secondly, how does one handle running two LNS servers? How does the >> border router know which edge (LNS) to forward too for a particular >> IP? > > I do it with iBGP where my router is advertising individual /32's. > Yes it makes the route tables longer but it works well in my environment. > YMMV. > > Mike- > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
