> -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark > Tinka > Sent: 16 September 2014 07:10 > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] I-BGP/IGP question > > > First, use NEXT_HOP=self; it's good practice. >
I know this is good practice, but only because I've heard lots of (very knowledgeable!) people *say* that it's good practice. So I just wondered *why*? :-) Is it just so you don't have to carry that external /31 to the real next hop in your IGP? I guess if you've got ten thousand exit points that wouldn't be desirable, but if it's just a couple of hundred say, is that such a bad thing? Or is there more to it than that? ---- An undeletable homily from the lawyers below this line, apologies. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************************************************************** Satellite Information Services Limited. Registered Office: Whitehall Avenue, Kingston, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK10 0AX. Company No. 4243307 The information in this email (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. Unauthorized recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
