Thanks for the response. The missing piece for me was understanding that send-label depends on labels allocated by ldp(v4).
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Vitkovský Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to enable send-label on ipv6 bgp neighbors, and move vpnv6 > > over to ipv6. > > Even though you'd be able to advertise PE loopbacks along with their > labels via ipv6 bgp transport sessions. > These PE loopbacks still needs to be IPv4 addresses so that LDP can > allocate labels for them within the particular area. > So you would not be able to move VPNv6 to IPv6 anyways. > > adam > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Tim Durack > > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 8:31 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS 15.4(2)T unified mpls send-label > > > > I am lab testing "unified mpls" using bgp send-label. This is working > well for > > ipv4/vpnv4/vpnv6. > > > > I would like to enable send-label on ipv6 bgp neighbors, and move vpnv6 > > over to ipv6. > > > > Doesn't look like send-label is a supported feature in 15.4(2)T1 for > ipv6 bgp > > neighbors unless I am missing something. > > > > Anyone else run into this? > > > > -- > > Tim:> > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
