If you don't need segmentation I don't see the benefit of moving to mVPN. Only consider if you think there will be segmentation needs in the future.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on, including > LSM. Yay for a PIM-free core! > > We’ve also got a whack of ME3600 PEs in ring that hang off of the A9Ks. > Also fully MPLS enabled; all L3 ME3600 and A9K core. While looking to > bring multicast out to these ME3600 PEs, which don’t support LSM, we’re > faced with whether or not we deploy MVPN or just plain-old-multicast. In > our particular deployment, multicast receivers, which we own and control, > would be hanging off of our ME3600 PEs. As such, all sources (behind the > LSM core) and all receivers would all be in the same VRF. > > In order to do MVPN, we’d have to enable PIM between the ME3600s and the > A9Ks anyway, so since this is all in a common VRF, is there really any > benefit to doing MVPN? > > Thanks in advance for any insight. > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
