On 03/12/14 15:46, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 14:09 +0000, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 03/12/14 12:50, Peter Rathlev wrote:
(PS: It has to be pure IP as seen from the rest of the network, so no
MPLS unless it's something like MPLSoGRE.)
For curiosity - why *not* MPLS? It really sounds like a job for VPLS,
but you obviously have some reason not to do that.
Well, I need to attach these devices to the access ports on the edge of
the network. For a VPLS service I would need to privison an MPLS enabled
VLAN on the access layer, wouldn't I? That seems rather complicated
though this might just be my inexperience saying that.
The VLAN is just a plain old VLAN as far as the layer2 network is concerned.
The differences all exists at the MPLS PE router.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
