Hello We have a number of those connected and in use. We use the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G version of it. The only complaint we have is that the connection sometimes suffer from packetloss and a reboot is required to clear it up. Although we haven't done any more in-depth analysis of it since the nature of the connection has been best effort in nature.
Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication & Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 [email protected] www.steria.se -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Blake Dunlap Sent: den 10 december 2014 02:52 To: Mike Hale Cc: cisco-nsp@pu ck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card The software got much better in the last year or two. It works pretty well all things considered. -Blake On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Mike Hale <[email protected]> wrote: > I can only speak to the ATT Version of the card, but for us it's been > pretty solid. We have it sitting at an isolated site in the bay area, > and it's been reliable. > > Pain in the ass to get setup at first, but after that it's been good. > They must have fixed a lot of the stability issues. > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Ryan Wilkins <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 10:35 AM, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone have any experience with the EHWIC-4G-LTE-V card for VZW 4G? >> >> I've implemented one in a mobile command truck for a police department. I >> can't say that I've been very impressed and have had to open numerous TAC >> cases pertaining to both the LTE EHWIC card and its predecessor, the 3G HWIC >> card. The issue that I've had have been that the connection doesn't stay up >> all the time. There were some settings that I felt would help keep the card >> stay online (disabling idle timeouts, short delays between disconnect and >> reconnect, etc) however the card would still drop offline regularly even in >> the middle of a data transfer. It has been a couple years since I've >> touched that card so I don't remember all the specifics but my recollection >> is that after about 10 minutes the card would disconnect. Verizon claimed >> that they weren't doing anything of the sort. One thing that will drop the >> connection, by the way, is sending out RFC1918 and multicast traffic to the >> VZW network. I implemented egress filtering to block those types of traffic >> but th! e! > link would still regularly drop. The TAC engineer told me that some of the > commands I was trying to configure weren't actually doing anything because > the support didn't exist in the IOS release I was using and he didn't think > the commands would ever be supported. Maybe things are different now but my > previous experience had been anything but flawless. >> >> Best, >> Ryan Wilkins >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > -- > 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
