Thanks Lukas - The numbers quoted were from Cisco (Our Cisco AM, and he engaged a 1900 "specialist" @ Cisco)..there recommendation (Of course) is to go for a larger CE to get guaranteed(required) throughputs...I was more interested in clarifying the duplex/half-duplex, which you have done(Cheers)
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CE Router performance > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:28:01 +0100 > > > Quick question on Cisco's claimed performance figures for CE's > > > > - Cisco claim a 1921 could do 400Mb > > I don't believe Cisco is claiming any such thing, they usually play it safe. > > Cisco positions the 1900 series quote: > > "in high-speed WAN environments with concurrent services enabled > > up to 15 Mbps." > > Now, you can push more than 100mbit/s through this box, no doubt, > but you are completely on your own. Routerperformance slide says > a 1941 pushes 299kpps or 150mbit/s (at 64byte packets), that gives > you a little room and you may reach 400mbit/s in lab conditions, > but you will be on your own (say a mandatory IOS upgrade due to > security bugfixes introduces a forwarding performance regression?). > > This is really (quote) "never-to-exceed [...] feature-free CEF throughput". > > Datasheet doesn't guarantee anything on ISR G1/G2. Get ISR 4k for > bandwidth guarantees. > > > > > My question is, is the 400Mb/sec and 110Mb/sec full duplex? > > Throughput means pushing traffic from one (ingress) interface to another > (egress) interface, so we are talking half duplex here. > > > Lukas > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
