Thanks very much , it helped me out
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] REP and Spanning-Tree > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:02:20 -0500 > CC: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > See the last two pages of this white paper: > http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/switches/me-3400-series-ethernet-access-switches/prod_white_paper0900aecd806ec6fa.pdf > > - Ed > > > > On Mar 3, 2015, at 09:39, M K <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have the below topology > SW1 -- SW2 -- SW3SW1 and SW2 already ar part from a ring that is running REP > (i.e. no spanning -tree on the link between SW1 and SW2)No , I got a new > switch (SW4) and connect it to SW1 and SW3 (which means I have now closed > circuit)My questions is , would that be an issue? > SW4 -STP- SW1 - REP - SW2 -STP - SW3 - STP - SW4 > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
