> On 31 Mar 2015, at 16:19, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > On 31/Mar/15 16:04, James Bensley wrote: > >> >> Yeah ISRG2 boxes do support L2TPv3. I have very successfully deployed >> them in very forgettable ways. > > Okay. > > So safe to say any software-based router should support it (excluding > VM-based images, of course).
Theses days ‘software’ is becoming too general. QFP on ASR1k are in essence programmable CPUs but with scalability and performance similar to hardware platforms. L2TPv3 is supported on all ISRs, including the new 44xx series, which are - like ASR1k - also spending CPU cores (albeit, under common IOS processing) to do forwarding job separately from control plane (which one of the cores is doing). CSR1k should also support L2TPv3 BTW. -- "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/