Thanks Gustav - Notice there is a difference in buffer size (4948 v Nexus), but store and forward vs cut-though may make the buffer difference moot?
Any issues with micro bursts causing drops on the Nexus? (As we see virtually none on the 4948's) Cheers. > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) > Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:29:29 +0000 > > Hello. > Yes we are using Nexus 3048 for TOR when 10 Ge isn't necessary so that is the > direct replacement for our 4948E TOR switches. > We are generally very pleased with them both price, feature and performance > wise. > However these are getting rather old now so we are woundering if they are > being EOLed soon. > > //Gustav. > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill > Woodcock > Sent: den 15 april 2015 02:59 > To: CiscoNSP List > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) > > > > On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:24 PM, CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Thanks Bill - So you've been happy with the Nexus? Have you moved from the > > Cat range to Nexus? > > Yes, entirely, as of about two years ago. Very happy with them. > > -Bill > > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
