Peter, > On 02 Sep 2015, at 22:49, Peter Kranz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’m using bgp maximum-paths and several peers announcing the same /32 to > create a poor man’s load balancer. This works well with up to 16 peers after > which the CEF number of buckets is exceeded. > > However, if the number of connected peers change, all sessions break, which > I would like to avoid.
That’s the way CEF works - it has to rebuild the hash every time new nexthop appears or vanishes. This is 6500 you’ve mentioned in different post, right? What is the overall architecture of the thing you’re trying to achieve here (remote terminal access?). — Łukasz Bromirski _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
