On 18/Sep/15 10:43, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
> Hazarding a guess: you have explicit costs assigned to the local links of > 201 and 202. But as OSPF is a link vector protocol, all costs between local > interface and destination interface are added together. So when you add the > cost of all links between source and destination, they must add up to 205 on > each of two paths. And thus get load balanced. A reasonable theory. Just to clarify, OSPF is a link state routing protocol :-). But yes, in essence, as with all routing protocols, the end-goal is to calculate the best vector toward another node. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
