Dear Vinod So I don't get the point. If EoMPLS over GRE is not supported so why EoMPLS without GRE is supported? Anyway If we use GRE just for routing the traffic (MPLS/IP) does it work properly? In my tests I did not have any issue with routing MPLS/IP traffic over GRE between two 920 or 920 with other routers(M320,7200VXR,2821,..) but it was in the lab with a little amount of traffic. I am talking about 4 or 5 Gbps traffic. Another thing which came into my mind is the proper replacement. What if we use ASR1001 or ASR1002(X) ? Then in that case can we have proper EoMPLS over GRE same as old IOS routers but with more power and capacity of handling more traffic?
Thank you in advanced. Alireza -----Original Message----- From: Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam (vinbalas) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:17 AM To: Gert Doering <[email protected]>; Alireza Soltanian <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN between ASR920 and Juniper Hi Gert, I differ from your opinion. If you compare the feature set, it is actually the other way.It's more of a router with strong carrier ethernet capabilities. ASR 920 supports MPLS, MPLE TE, MP-BGP, 6PE, 6 VPE, LFA, RLFA, L2VPN, L3VPN, BGP PIC and some segment routing. Those are mostly the protocols what you would see in a SP routing world space today. On the layer 2 we support G.8032. REP, MST, CFM and Y1731. Thanks, Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam ENGINEER.TECHNICAL MARKETING [email protected] WebEx Social profile <http://iwe.cisco.com/web/vinbalas> Phone: +1 408 527 2051 Mobile: +1 919 802 8751 CCIE - 25703 www.cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/> Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Please click here <http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for Company Registration Information. On 9/22/15, 1:33 PM, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:42:22PM +0330, Alireza Soltanian wrote: >> What do you mean? >> You mean We cannot use EoMPLS over GRE on ASR920? >> So why Cisco 7200VXR or Cisco 2800 can support this feature while they >>are >> older and weaker routers? > >Switches are dumb and fast, routers are slow and flexible. > >ASR920 is a closer to a switch than to a router. > >gert > > >-- >USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > >//www.muc.de/~gert/ >Gert Doering - Munich, Germany >[email protected] >fax: +49-89-35655025 >[email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
