On 5/Oct/15 13:10, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> 10g on asr1k is generally not a cost effective proposition. > > The OP has not provided any indication of bandwidth requirements other than > "more than 1Gbps of traffic", nor overall budget, nor technical > requirements (policy, mpls, etc). So there is probably a requirement for > 10G ports, but other than that it's not clear. > > If the requirement is to do this on the cheap, a brocade CER2000 will > probably work, but it won't scale due to the fact that it only has 4x10G > ports and cannot be expanded. If it's only a couple of gbit/sec, then > maybe a csr1000v on good quality hardware would work. It would probably > require some tuning work to get reasonable performance out of it, though. > > Otherwise a cisco asr9001 or a juniper mx104 would probably be the best > options. The forwarding capabilities of these two units are comparable, > but the asr9k1 RP is much faster than the current mx104 RE. I.e. BGP > convergence is much better. All true. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
