You are right, nice catch :) I'll look at the 6840-X as well.
-----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Hill Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 4500X Roadmap On 19/10/15 22:05, Steve Mikulasik wrote: > L3 is needed as well. L2TP support is a big plus too. Would the 6840-X not make a better fit? I can't see reference to the 4500-X doing L2TP at all. (L2PT, yes, but that's *totally* different.) -- Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
