2015-11-16 20:39 GMT+01:00 Gert Doering <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:35:48PM +0100, Pierre Emeriaud wrote: >> 2015-11-16 19:26 GMT+01:00 Erik Klaassen <[email protected]>: >> > >> > What is the best way to prevent the exabgp route entering the fib? >> >> This may sound weird, but why not announcing the routes from exa with >> an inaccessible next-hop (like 25.1.1.1, not announced globally)? This >> should prevent them from beeing installed in fib. >> >> Am I missing something that would make this hack not working? > > Routers generally do not propagate prefixes that are not installed > locally...
Generally yes. But RR do(can?). Couldn't Erik do the same here? _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
