Biggest issue is buffer space.  3750X has 2750KB shared between 24 GE ports.  
Switch models starting with 29XX are similar or worse.  3650 and 3850 show 12MB 
shared between 48 ports 
(http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3650-series-switches/qa_c67-729531.html).
I believe the memory allocation mechanism is also significantly improved on the 
3650/3850, but don't have the links handy to support this.

We've been using 3650s to support EMC VNXe SANs, very successfully so far.  
Also used them to terminate Metro-E connections.  No problems, as opposed to 
the predecessors, 3550 and 3560G, which racked up output drops due to lack of 
buffers.  
Check your expected bandwidth needs, and the number of 10G ports.  3650 is 
likely to be a good fit.

4948E shows 17.5MB of memory shared between 48 ports.  I believe it is a 4500 
Sup6-E in a fixed chassis with 48 ports, so fairly old by now.  That said, I 
have Sup6 in production supporting SAN and Metro-E with no problems.

Sincerely,
Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam 
Greene
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 9:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

Hi all,

 I know running Catalyst switches for SAN backbone fabric is not the best idea, 
due to limited buffers. 
However, we have been doing just that with a 3750X and Dell Equallogic 
6100/4100s for quite some time, with no issues.
We are putting in a NetApp FAS3160 and need to add a switch. I see 3750X is EOL 
and Cisco positions the 3850 as its replacement. 3850 is even slightly less 
expensive than 3750X.

Questions:
-          Should we expect the 3850 to perform as well or better than the 
3750X for this application?
-          Is there any other switch we should be looking at which is not 
humongously more expensive? Maybe Nexus 3k could work, but it's a lot more 
expensive. Maybe 4948E? Seems up there price-wise, too . 

Thanks,

Adam

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to