>

        Adam Vitkovsky
        IP Engineer

T:      0333 006 5936
E:      [email protected]
W:      www.gamma.co.uk

This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of 
this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which 
it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. 
No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it 
in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, 
please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our 
postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email [email protected]

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with 
limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office 
is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at 
Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.


-----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Lukas Tribus
> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 6:58 PM
> An interesting (brand-) new platform is the Cisco NCS 5000 series. You get a
> fixed box, for example the NCS 5002, which is 2RU, has 80x 1G/10G and 4x
> 100G ports. Runs IOS-XR and appears to be quite competitive.
>
> The datasheet [1] doesn't mention mac limits (or route limits), but its is
> certainly not the box you would use as mpls edge (carrying the full table).
>
> Not sure about the FCS date either.
>
Interesting I didn't know the NCS6K has a little brother, though it's a shame 
it's not nPower based.
But since it appears to be a full blown MPLS router it certainly is an 
interesting twist to DC architecture,
I'm thinking possibly running EVPN within DC all the way down to 
Servers(virtual switch) instead of FP/TRILL/SPB or VXLAN in a DC

Cause to my knowledge currently there's no option for basically redistributing 
ISIS to MP-BGP to realize all active data-plane forwarding between the DC and 
MPLS core (as we know it from IP routing i.e per flow load-sharing not per VLAN 
(not possible with SPB))
BGP control plane for VXLAN is the closest one but my understanding is it's not 
quite there yet.


adam
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to