On 19/Jan/16 14:31, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> I agree with general meaning of NG-MVPN. > But even with e.g. mLDP data-plane and BGP control plane there are plethora > of options so one is not sure what is the topic of discussion. > As for the mLDP one could be using Default/Partitioned MDT along with > P2MP/MP2MP tree. > And as for BGP control plane one could be using BGP-AD with or without > BGP-C-MCAST. > So a lot of ambiguity even though we narrow the discussion down to mLDP > data-plane and BGP control-plane. These are vendor-specific. In the RFC, it's basic I-PMSI vs. S-PMSI (data plane) or RPT-SPT vs. SPT-only (control plane), e.t.c. How the vendor actually implements them is unique to them (hence the fancy names some of these sub-features end up having). If you keep the baisc principles in mind, you'll be fine, especially in multi-vendor environments. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
