On 19 January 2016 at 10:21, Adam Vitkovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Until once NP got frozen keeping the L1 up but no TX -and that's where the > BFD saved the day. > > So I see now that the UDLD is sort of a BFD for L2 switches.
This is same example as Lukas has, it cannot be used to justify complexity. It's just logical fallacy, you can't say 'well NPU software might break, then let's add this UDLD software, to cover that problem'. Now you have two software's which can fail. Someone smarter than me, might be able to prove this, or at least prove it's essentially a halting problem. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
