The last 1001X I bought, I accidently ordered the 1001 - when I changed my order, I think the price was the same or almost minimal difference. Cisco doesn't want people buying the old kit either.
-----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Feedly Reader Sent: 02 February 2016 22:38 To: Nicolas KARP; Ian Goodall Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 vs 1001-X PPP Hi Ian, Based on my understanding, the CPU on 1001-X is more powerful and can handle more concurrent session establishments. It also has 2 10G interfaces which can come in handy. However, the queue-count is considerably lower in the 1001s which makes QoS difficult, depending on your policies. I would recommend a 1002-X if you are looking at ASR 1K. Have a look at this document here for more details: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html Vaibhav ________________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of Nicolas KARP <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:27 PM To: Ian Goodall Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 vs 1001-X PPP Hello Ian, ASR 1001 is going to be EOS on April : http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/eos-eol-notice-c51-734572.html Replacement : 1001-X And it's the same price... # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - # - - Nicolas KARP # - - Network and Security Engineer # - - Email : [email protected] <[email protected]> # - - Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp # - - Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20> # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2016-02-02 19:48 GMT+01:00 Ian Goodall <[email protected]>: > We have a number of older 7206 routers used in a LNS role (PPP/L2TP). > > As part of a network refresh we are looking to move towards the > ASR1001 or 1001-X. The datasheet shows both support up to 5Gbps > throughput and 8k subs. > > Is anyone able to confirm if 8k subs on a ASR1001 realistic in the > real world, or should we be looking at the higher CPU on the X version? > > Also on the throughput restriction is this in+out on all ports combined? > For example we have L2TP/PPP on one interface and upstream traffic on > another port. If we have 1Mbps of traffic coming in and then route out > on the L2TP/PPP interface is this counted as 1Mbps or 2Mbps? > > Thanks in advance. > > Ian > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
