Hi, On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:27:43AM +0000, James Bensley wrote: > Well bit a rant from me there, sorry ;) > > This issue didn't show up in lab testing and we haven't been able to > replicate it (nor have TAC). It seems to be something about the > ordering of patching and that was the point I wanted to highlight but > poorly eluded to. > > A fresh 4.3.4 install then add SP10 and it "just works". This box was > 4.3.4 default, then some SMUs, then SP6 and then SP10 (each upgrade > was suggested by TAC because of a different issue ocuring over the > lifecycle of the box).
Indeed, *that* is something that really should not happen (and explains
why "clear everything and do a fresh OS install" might be a good idea,
depending on the history of the affected device).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
