Cisco has put a lot of effort into this functionality in the last 2 years. I would suggest looking at IWAN: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Jan2015/CVD-IWANDesignGuide-JAN15.pdf
Arie On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 March 2016 at 18:34, Joel M Snyder <[email protected]> wrote: > > I designed it into a network of about 90 sites (global, not US) and it > was > > not a resounding success. The management was ugly, but more importantly > it > > just didn't play well with others and at some clear points wasn't > working at > > all. It was pulled out in favor of a WAN opt solution (Cisco WaaS > appliance > > in that case). I reviewed it again and did some testing for a larger > > network of 400+ sites recently, but the feature set wasn't measuring up > to > > the requirements and the customer stuck Riverbeds ahead of the IOS boxes > and > > is quite happy with the results. > > Looks like PfR is lot more than just IP SLA udp jitter/icmp probe + > tracking. My comments were strictly on that, I've not done the > controller based PfR. > > -- > ++ytti > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
