However we seriously considered 920 for internet edge with minimal BGP routes only - for that we had to go ASR1k to keep in-line with other offices,
-----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: 31 March 2016 12:48 To: Gert Doering Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920 We/Clients needed netflow from the get-go, as far as I know - it's still not available on the 920 ;( Plus we use some VRF-lite + static VTI/DMVPN which I do not know if it is supported on the 920 -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 31 March 2016 11:04 To: Nick Cutting Cc: Gert Doering; Mark Tinka; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920 Hi, On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:49:05AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote: > We bought a few 4451's but that was before the 4431 came out. > > For edge gigabit internet devices (BGP default route only) , when NOT > using ASR1k, we now use ISR4431/K9 + 1 gig throughput license They > are one U, unlike 4451 which is 2U and somehow filled with bricks Did you not evaluate ASR920 at all ("1U, not very deep") or do you need ISR features that the ASR920 doesn't have? Just curious. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
