Can you try and define what was different during the 10% of the tests that worked? When it doesn't work, what exactly doesn't work? Maybe share a few config examples and how you test if it works or doesn't work...
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017, 06:27 Nick Cutting <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry - I mean nexus 9k, rather than ASR9000 > And the ASr920 tunnels were ASR - ASR, not ASR -> nexus > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Nick Cutting > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:25 AM > To: cisco-nsp ([email protected]) <[email protected]> > Subject: [c-nsp] GRE tunnels on 9k > > Good morning, > > I am having some really crazy results when testing GRE tunnels on nexus > 9k's. > > They seem to work about 10 percent of the time. > I am going a little mad thinking about where the stars and planets were > when these tunnels worked. > > This is with the source and destination in the global table, and testing > the tunnel IP, both in a VRF and in the global table. > This has been tested using both loopbacks as a source, and the outgoing > interfaces. Although I want to use loopbacks as we are using L3 multi-path. > I have searched the bug database I don't see anything strange . going to > hit up TAC. Tunnels over the same links on a terminated on ASR920 work > fine. > > Has anyone had any good / bad experiences with tunnels on the 9k? > > Thank you, > nick > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
