What code are you running? On my N9k it accepts both:

Software
  BIOS: version 07.61
  NXOS: version 7.0(3)I6(2)
  BIOS compile time:  04/06/2017
  NXOS image file is: bootflash:///nxos.7.0.3.I6.2.bin
  NXOS compile time:  10/17/2017 19:00:00 [10/17/2017 21:48:10]

SW-01(config)# router ospf CH-L02
SW-01(config-router)#   vrf ClientA
SW-01(config-router-vrf)# area 1 stub no-summary 
SW-01(config-router-vrf)# area 1 range 10.203.165.80/28
SW-01(config-router-vrf)#

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Inter-area Summarization problem on Nexus 9508

This message originates from outside of your organisation.

On Thursday, 16 November, 2017 13:24, "Brian Turnbow" <[email protected]> said:

>>  Anyone know what is wrong with the below range ?
>>
> 
> Yep, host bits are set
> You need to put in the network
> 
>> router ospf 386
>>   vrf AAA
>>     area 0.0.0.1 stub no-summary
>>
>> NX9KB9002(config-router-vrf)#     area 1 range 10.203.165.80/28
>> Invalid range, host bits are set

10.203.165.80 is a valid network address for a /28, but doesn't "area range" 
take an address and dotted-quad netmask rather than a CIDR prefix?  So:

area 1 range 10.203.165.80 255.255.255.240

Regards,
Tim.


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to