No issues as of now since I am using RSVP TE with explicit-path. And, the signaling seems ok all the times.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Patrick Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > I've not experienced any issues using them as P, but that is in a pure > cisco environment. Interop can always be a pain. > > PC > > Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:38:34PM +0000, Ian Goodall wrote: > > > > After further investigation and debug it looks like we have hit bug > > CSCuy29638 in a Juniper environment. > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 23/Jan/18 18:49, Ian Goodall wrote: > > > > > > Can anyone confirm if the ASR920 platform can be used in a MPLS P role? > > > They are working fine for us as small PE but we are having some very > odd > > > RSVP issues in the lab with transit LSP. > > > > > > > > > What are these odd issues? > > > > > > Mark. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > -- > Patrick Cole <[email protected]> > Senior Network Specialist > Spirit Telecom Ltd > 19-25 Raglan St, South Melbourne VIC 3205 > Ph: 0410 626 630 > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
