Hi, On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:30:20AM +0000, Richard Clayton wrote: > I ended up dumping the OTV design for my customer as it was too expensive > to deploy. It's only supported on the 4451 (customer has been quoted for > 4431) and needs and AppX license, was looking at £9000+ per router and > there is a built in 100Mb limit on OTV traffic. I'm doing VPLS now but was > good to play with OTV in a lab environment. May come across it one day out > in the wild.
Nothing better than "make it silly expensive" to kill a proprietary technology that could be used for "happy customer lock-in" instead. Big company strategical planning is beyond me... gert -- now what should I write here... Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
