On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 at 19:22, Sami Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
> What is the main reason for J to build ELS ? As far as I can ascertain they changed Marvell to Broadcom and needed to program things differently. Instead of abstracting this without user visible changes, they just exposed different keys to user visible configuration. Not unique thing vendors do, I see no reason why ES+ in Cisco needed to get EVC CLI, why not just map EVC as subinterface. But it is what it is. Ultimately it's minor inconvenience if you have proper source of truth in formal format, translating it to multiple informal formats isn't that expensive. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
