Robert Raszuk wrote: > > > > > > A protocol designed to speak between 2 different autonomous systems. > > > > > > If that is not an option, not using a routing protocol is also a good > > > idea, i.e., static routing. > > > > Well, the Internet is full of examples and recommendations of an IGP > > (most often OSPF) being used between PE and CE, so it must be common > > practice. In fact, OSPF even has special enhancements for this very > > purpose. > > > > > > > > You're not my immediate competitor, so I'll advise you not to run an IGP > > > with a customer. > > > > Again, it seems a common practice to run an IGP with a customer to > > import the customer's routes into the provider's MPLS network.
> Yes - the examples are there on the net for most BGP resistant customers > and non managed CPEs ... But as others already said all biggest SPs which > are still offering L3VPNs are only doing BGP and static. Still, the answer to my initial and direct question about IS-IS is... "yes" or "no"? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
