Is that XRv or XRv9K? XRv was great as it didn't require as many resources.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Have you all been able to use EVE-NG ? My gosh, what an awesome emulator. > > > > I have eve-ng running… > > > > XRv > > vMX > > vQFX > > > > (this might end up being a much larger topic) BTW, Why does Juniper do > what appears to be such a better job with CP/FP (control plane/forwarding > plane) separation ? I’m speaking about XR and Junos and also how clean > Junos vMX seems to be done as I work with it in EVE-NG when compared to XRv. > > > > XRv is still one node. > > > > vMX is 2 nodes… VCP and VFP. > > > > Also, in XRv I can’t add martini-type access pw’s into an l2vpn nor can I > add routing on a BVI….. but, conversely I can do all those things in vMX > > > > As nice as XR(v) is, it still seems to be playing catch-up to (v)MX. Is > this true in your mind ? > > > > Stepping away from the eve-ng emulator for a moment, over the years of > working with XR I was so pleased with how it improved upon classic IOS…. > But then I began working with Junos a few years ago, and wow, it seemed to > take routing os to a whole other level than XR did… again, this could be in > my head, but curious what others think, IF, you have actually done enough > work on both platforms to know enough to speak to it. > > > > -Aaron > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/