Re: [c-nsp] ospf auto-cost reference-bandwidth on modern gigabit networks

[Mark Tinka]

On 30/Apr/20 11:39, Saku Ytti wrote:

> I think an interesting exercise is, why don't we see BW based ISIS
> topologies, but we do see OSPF? I think it is status quo bias, because
> vendors offer OSPF with this default, is must make sense.

Your basis (bandwidth, latency, function, e.t.c.) is just an arbitrary
concept that you can develop for yourself.

That a "reference-bandwidth" command does not exist in IS-IS doesn't
mean anything. You're welcome not to use it in OSPF too :-).

Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/